Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Who’s Suing Whom: May 5, 2023

The latest from the B.C. Supreme Court
lawcourts-2020-web-cc
The B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver

These corporate claims were filed with the B.C. Supreme Court registry in Vancouver.

Information is derived from notices of civil claim. Civil claims have not been tested or proven in court. 

Defendant

WonderFi Technologies Inc.

Plaintiff

Limelight Capital Services Inc. and Sheona Docksteader

Claim

$117,512.32 to cover one unpaid invoice as an agreed-upon bonus for getting the defendant listed on a securities exchange, and another for unpaid corporate securities and paralegal work done by the plaintiffs as a contractor for the defendant.

Defendants

A & P Fruit Growers Ltd. and Sikhminder Singh Bath

Plaintiff

Geri Partnership doing business as Golden Eagle Farms

Claim

CA$941,694 and US$1,925,319 for unpaid blueberry sales from the plaintiff to the defendants.

Defendants

Tao Wu and 1189397 B.C. Ltd. and Star Education Technology Inc. and YouPlus Education Inc.

Plaintiff

Hao Wang

Claim

$100,000 and general damages for breach of contract after the plaintiff was induced to buying shares in a numbered company after being told the defendants would transfer ownership in Star Education Technology Inc. to that numbered company.

Defendants

Minerva Semiconductor Corp. and Chong Ma also known as Chong Chao Ma also known as Marc C. Ma and Zhuo Liu and Sathesan Ganesarajah

Plaintiff

SCGE Global Energy Canada Ltd.

Claim

US$16,999,936 for unjust enrichment and breach of agreement after the plaintiff agreed to buy 8,100 cryptocurrency mining computers from the defendants and made a $30-million pre-payment but has only received 3,070 complete machines and 333 unassembled machines.

Defendant

RLG International Inc.

Plaintiffs

Brad Farrow and B. Farrow Holdings Ltd. and Dave Helewka and 0773875 B.C. Ltd.

Claim

A declaration that the defendant’s conduct has been oppressive to the plaintiffs as shareholders for reneging on a tranche buyback of his shares and improperly pushing a vote to buy back the plaintiff’s shares at a reduced price due to the pandemic.