Re: “Foolish not to learn from other major cities,” April 1.
Last Wednesday, Michael [Geller] gave a talk at SFU to illustrate the points he raised in the Courier. Kudos to Michael for sharing his idea-provoking photos and the lessons learned from other major cities. Here are two more ideas based on his statement, at the talk, that the Vancouver Foundation’s survey of residents had revealed a concern over loneliness and lack of community.
First idea on community building: Build community infrastructure within high density buildings. Common rooms or amenity rooms should be on the ground floor and open to residents passing from the front door, basement parkade or mail box to the elevator. Adjacent outdoor green space for summer evening gatherings and for children to play in sight of their parents from the amenity room would be an excellent design feature and will further encourage interaction between building residents.
Amenity rooms hidden in the basement on upper floors overlooking the back lane should be considered as poor design.
Second idea on community building: Build street boulevard infrastructure to encourage neighbourhood interaction. Mid-block curb bulges (I call them boulevard bulges to emphasize the non-vehicular space) designed with a tree swing, a bench or two, free book exchange box or perhaps a community volunteer flower garden would provide great opportunities for impromptu street conversation and play.
If the boulevard bulge was complimented by another bulge opposite, leaving space for one vehicle lane between, the proposed Canada Post community mail boxes could also be accommodated and thereby increase the chance of impromptu interaction. By default they would become the location of choice for annual neighbourhood block parties.
A few guidelines would be necessary such as agreement by residents within the block on location and the facilities to be incorporated. And, of course, a permit would likely be necessary.
David Grigg, Vancouver
